Foreword
On
Human Systems
Humanity
is collectively constituted by a single species--gene flow among human
subpopulations has been relatively rapid and has occurred for many successive
generations on regional and global scales. This species maintains one of the
greatest biomasses on earth and is the greatest consumer of natural
resources--thus its growth has put a strain and stress on almost every biome and
biological region on earth, in numerous ways, whether direct or indirect, and
the kind of adaptive equilibrium achieved by Homo sapiens is complex and
complexly mediated by many artificial and artifactual inventions.
It
is becoming increasingly imperative that we come to terms with the systems of
our own creation, its biological consequences and its long-term state-path
trajectory in the world. We can ill afford to maintain systems that prove in the
long term self-destructive or bio-destructive without being able to at least
substantially repair the damage to ecosystems caused by this pattern of
development.
Human
systems on one hand, constituted by a single kind of animal form, are relatively
basic. On the other hand in terms of their complexity and size, and in terms of
the complexity of the human mind and of human cultural and knowledge systems,
they are extremely vast and varied on earth.
The
object of human systems theory is the development of a comprehensive and unified
framework concerning the development of human system, and the mechanical
explanation for their patterning. This is based upon the proposition that human
systems constitute something, if not unique in the universe, then certainly
quite unusual and extremely rare, and the enlarged capacity of the human brain,
combined with an unique anthropomorphic trait complex, has resulted in the
formation of alternative real systems that are the artificial product of human
invention and imagination, and that did not exist previously in the natural
world. Such systems therefore constitute an entire strata which connects to
natural systems, and that also bridges over to the theory of alternative
systems.
Human
systems theory can never achieve the degree of coherence and parsimony found in
physical systems theory. Human systems are multi-factorial and therefore highly
underdetermined developmentally in their hyper-complex states. For human systems
especially, it is a problem of language--of having the terms and definitions
suitable for such extreme complexity--as well as of logic. Outcomes in the
historical development of human systems cannot follow predictable pathways.
The
main consequence of this is that achievement of a comprehensive human systems
theory must compromise itself paradigmatically, and can at best be
poly-paradigmatic and thereby meta-paradigmatic rather than merely a single
comprehensive and singularly coherent explanation of such systems. It must thus
borrow insight, information and frameworks from multiple sources and disciplines
of study of human patterning, and it must forge what is at best a kind of
explanatory framework that permits and has latitude for multiple alternative
hypothesis and theories of the same sets of phenomena, cast from different
theoretical points of view and in terms of different words and languages
defining these alternative perspectives.
These
alternative human-made systems may be said in a loose sense to be intelligent
systems, at least in that they are the product of human intelligence, and thus
incorporate intentional design in their patterning. We refer to the overall
patterning of these systems in a social sense to be
"civilizations"--what Alfred Kroeber referred to as the style
patterning that is the product of human genius.
The
question remains unanswered whether or not there are other intelligent
civilizations in the universe that are not human in origin, but that are
the product of the evolutionary development of other alien life-forms. It
is certainly the case that alien intelligence is a possibility. If it could
arise on earth, then certainly it can under the right circumstances arise upon
any planet. It is expected though that this outcome is extremely unlikely from a
simple stochastic standpoint, hence, the development of alternative intelligent
civilization elsewhere in the universe is highly unlikely, or extremely rare and
thus such civilizations much be very few and very, very far between.
It
almost goes without saying that any contact with especially advanced forms of
alien civilizations will be revolutionary upon multiple levels of our knowledge
and understanding of reality--it may even be symbolically destructive of our own
anthropomorphic sense of civilization if such alternative systems are extremely
powerful and more highly developed than our own. It is also more than likely
that we would eventually meet alien intelligence, because in their shared state
of curiosity they would be attempting to make contact with other alternative
civilizations like ourselves. The main obstacles to be overcome in this matter
are the vast depths of space-time probably involved in such long-range
communication, and the highly advanced state of technological development
probably required to over come such distances, if this is indeed even possible
given fundamental limitations such as the speed of light. Civilizations may well
go extinct before they have the chance of having their signals received by
distant targets.
But
such contact must be necessary if we are to push a meta-paradigmatic perspective
of alternative intelligent systems, or civilizations to a new level that we
might refer to them as been truly "universal" in application. In the
patient meantime, we must content ourselves with the conceit that our human civilization is quite alone in a
vast and mostly empty universe, and that we may be, if not the only life forms,
one of the most advanced ever produced. As far as we know now, and may ever
know, it is only human beings who have the capacity for realizing their own
predicament, uniqueness and solitariness in the universe, and for transcending
ultimately the constraints of nature that exist for all other known forms of
life we are familiar with. The knowledge that we may or may not be alone in the
universe, or that this might even matter, is ours alone to struggle and
experience. Dogs, cats, cattle, birds, fish--these creatures and all others we
know of are ultimately the subjects of their own making in the world, a part of
the world and nothing more. They lack the sentience that makes our own human
systems interesting, transcendent and special.
Blanket Copyright, Hugh M. Lewis, © 2009. Use of this text governed by fair use policy--permission to make copies of this text is granted for purposes of research and non-profit instruction only.
Last Updated: 09/16/09